Chicago’s vice district, known as the Levee, was a
segregated section of the city that housed brothels, dance halls, gambling,
drugs, bars, and many other technically illegal activities. Wikipedia defines
vice as “a practice or a behavior or habit considered immoral, depraved, or
degrading in the associated society.” [1] This is exactly what was located in
the Levee of Chicago, everything that the rest of the city knew existed but
didn’t want to see on a daily basis. That same thought is what black/white
segregation is about as well. White people knew blacks existed but for the most
part did not want them on their buses, in their movie theaters, in their
diners, or really anywhere that they had to see them and interact with them.
During the Gilded Age and Progressive era I believe that
vice created the most impact on American culture. In the case of vice in
Chicago it was the starting point for a movement that would change laws for all
Americans. Segregation, though it too had a part in the Levee, was not seen as
an evil (except of course to those who it affected) for common society. Whereas
vice in Chicago and the white slave idea, that of young girls being coerced or
forced into prostitution, was brought right to the doorsteps of white America.
It was Clifford Roe and his work on the Mona Marshall case
that first began the crusade against white slavery. After that, “suddenly there
were hundreds just like her, girls who turned victim as soon as they wandered
past the sanctioned boundaries of their lives.” [2] Publications were being
printed and the knowledge that young girls were being tricked or trapped into
lives of prostitution spread throughout the city. People were outraged at the
idea that not only are young white girls being targeted, but that they’re
supposed captors were being protected by crooked politicians who favored the Levee
district. Arrests were made but many of the arrested were soon back on the job
in a high turn around rate. Something had to be done, and “on December 6
(1909), Congressman James R. Mann of Chicago introduced a bill titled the White
Slave Traffic Act.” [3] Known as the Mann act, it prohibited the interstate
transfer of females for immoral purposes. After some change in politics and
more reformers pushing for change, the Levee district was closed for good by
1914.
The white slave trade scared the Nation. They believed any
minute someone was going to walk through their front door and steal their
daughters away into a life of crime, sin, and lots of horrible things. It wasn’t just Chicago however. All over
America people took notice and locally put stops to vice districts in their own
cities. “Atlanta, Georgia, announced that the city’s brothels would all close within
five days owing to the efforts of a group called Men and Religion Forward,” [4]
leaving one madam so distraught that she killed herself. Everywhere people were
afraid to let their daughters out of the house. This reaction is largely
because it was happening to white girls, and they were seen as helpless victims
of horrible men. To further differentiate most of the men involved were believed
to be immigrants, those of whom already were looked down upon in society.
I want to close by saying in retrospect to the entire
history of American culture I feel segregation is much more important and
culturally damaging, but to this specific time period the fight against vice
was hugely popular and important as people believed it affected them more
personally.
This person created a blog showcasing all the spots relevant
to the time period, including the Everleigh club, Vic Shaw’s Brothel, Freiberg’s
Dance Hall, and Colosimo’s Café. Also posting pictures of what those locations
look like today.
Finally, a solid gold piano because I was very curious about
the Everleigh sister’s absolute favorite thing.
[1] “Vice,” Wikipedia, accessed September 15, 2012, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice
[2] Karen Abbott, Sin
in the Second City: Madams, Ministers, Playboys, and the Battle for America’s
Soul (New York: Random House, 2007), 129.
[3] ibid., 207.
[4] ibid., 277.
No comments:
Post a Comment